TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOR CITY COUNCIL PACKET

FEBRUARY 2, 2010

 

GENERAL INFORMATION

Ÿ

 

Liquor License Applications Received for the Period of January 20, 2010 through January 26, 2010

 

Ÿ

 

Police Department Recommendations for Three Liquor License Items on the February 3, 2010 Formal Agenda

 

Ÿ

 

Follow-up:  January 26, 2010 Work Study Session Minutes and Consent Agenda Results

 

RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FROM COUNCIL/CITIZENS

 

The following information reports respond to requests from citizens at the Citizen’s Request Sessions:

 

Councilman DiCiccio

·

Requested staff to look into combining staffing efforts for trade shows with other valley cities as a way to save money.

 

 

Packet Date:  January 29, 2010


 

LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATIONS RECEIVED FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 20, 2010 THROUGH JANUARY 26, 2010

GENERAL INFORMATION

TO:

Lisa Takata

Executive Assistant to the City Manager

PACKET DATE:

January 27, 2010

FROM:

Mario Paniagua

City Clerk

 

 

 

 

SUBJECT:

LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATIONS RECEIVED FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 20, 2010 THROUGH JANUARY 26, 2010

 

 

This report provides advance notice of liquor license applications that were received by the City Clerk during the period of Wednesday, January 20, 2010 through Tuesday, January 26, 2010.

 

INFORMATION

The liquor license application process includes the posting of a public notice of the application at the proposed location for twenty days and the distribution of an application copy or a copy of this report to the following departments for their review: Finance, Planning, Police, Fire, Street Transportation, Development Services, and the Maricopa County Health Department.  Additionally, License Services mails a notice to all registered neighborhood organizations within a one-mile radius of each proposed business location (excluding Special Events).

 

Additional information on the items listed below is generally not available until the twenty-day posting/review period has expired.

 

LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATIONS

 

Application Type Legend

O-

Ownership

L-

Location

N-

New

OL-

Ownership & Location

AOC-

Acquisition of Control

SE-

Special Event

 

Liquor License Series Definitions

 

1     In State Producer

*

7     On sale-beer & wine

 

11  Hotel/Motel-all liquor on premises

 

3     Microbrewery

 

8     Conveyance license-sale of all liquor on board planes & trains

 

12  Restaurant-all liquor on premises

4     Wholesaler

 

5     Government

 

9     Off sale-all liquor

 

14  Clubs-all liquor on premises

*

6     On sale-all liquor

 

10  Off sale-beer & wine

 

15  Special Event

 

 

*

On-sale retailer means any person operating an establishment where spirituous liquors are sold in the original container for consumption on or off the premises and in individual portions for consumption on the premises.

 

Dist

 

App.

Type

 

Agent/Owner Name

Business Name/Address

Phone

 

Lic.

Type

 

Protest

Period

Ends

 

Within

2,000 Feet

of Light Rail

 

Proposed

Agenda

Date

2

 

SE

 

Kimberly Behrens

Phoenix Children’s Hospital Foundation (2/19-2/21/10)

5415 East High Street

602-546-5024

 

15

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

*2/19-2/21/10

2

 

N

 

Mark Smith, Agent

Rochelli’s Pizza House

21043 North Cave Creek Road

623-297-8888

 

12

 

2/12/10

 

No

 

3/3/10

2

 

O

 

Ashly Young, Agent

Chloe’s Corner

15215 North Kierland Blvd., #190

480-998-0202

 

7

 

2/16/10

 

No

 

3/3/10

2

 

O

 

Howard Hintz, Agent

Brokers Bar & Grill

16640 North Scottsdale Road

480-348-1010

 

6

 

02/19/10

 

No

 

3/10/10

4

 

N

 

Randy Guse, Agent

Walgreen’s #06063

1825 West Bethany Home Road

623-215-0407

 

10

 

2/12/10

 

Yes

 

3/3/10

4

 

N

 

Mukhdal Toor, Agent

Food Mart

710 East Indian School Road

623-334-8715

 

10

 

2/12/10

 

No

 

3/3/10

4

 

SE

 

Annette Thomson

Brophy College Preparatory (3/6/10)

4701 North Central Avenue

602-264-5291

 

15

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

3/3/10

4

 

N

 

Nadia Dbak, Agent

Smokes Plus

2835 North 16th Street, #4

623-433-9794

 

10

 

02/19/10

 

No

 

3/10/10

5

 

SE

 

Kimberly Behrens

Phoenix Children’s Hospital Foundation (3/27/10)

1561 West Las Palmaritas

602-546-5024

 

15

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

3/3/10

6

 

SE

 

Janeen McGregor Kokodynski

The Children’s Heart Foundation (2/20/10)

5010 South 48th Street

480-415-0613

 

15

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

*2/20/10

6

 

N

 

Vincent Rana, Agent

Mad Chef Gastro Pub

3941 East Chandler Blvd., #101

480-244-4586

 

12

 

2/19/10

 

No

 

3/10/10

6

 

O

 

Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent

Hotel Highland at Biltmore

2310 East Highland Avenue

602-667-6767

 

7

 

2/19/10

 

No

 

3/10/10

7

 

N

 

Diane Scoll-Stackwick, Agent

Coronado Café

2201 North 7th Street

480-209-0784

 

12

 

2/12/10

 

No

 

3/3/10

7

 

SE

 

Gary Egan

Phoenix Art Museum (3/13-3/14/10)

1625 North Central Avenue

602-257-2111

 

15

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

3/3/10

7

 

AOC

 

Theresa Morse, Agent

La Esquina Market

317 West Alta Vista

480-353-8035

 

10

 

02/19/10

 

No

 

3/10/10

8

 

SE

 

Richard Bauer

United Phoenix Firefighters Association, Inc. (2/20/10)

1 West Washington Street

602-363-6129

 

15

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

*2/20/10

8

 

SE

 

Debra Paine

Business Volunteers for the Arts/Phoenix, Inc. (4/9/10)

215 North 7th Street

602-826-1328

 

15

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

3/3/10

8

 

AOC

 

Theresa Morse, Agent

Mission Market

1042 North 26th Street

480-353-8035

 

10

 

02/19/10

 

No

 

3/10/10

*Event Date – Application not received in time for Council review.

 

For further information regarding any of the above applications, please contact the City Clerk Department, License Services Section, at 602-262-6018.

 

RECOMMENDATION

This report is provided for information only.  No Council action is required.

 


 

CITY COUNCIL REPORT

GENERAL INFORMATION

TO:

Lisa Takata

Executive Assistant to the City Manager

PACKET DATE:

January 28, 2010

FROM:

Mario Paniagua

City Clerk

 

 

 

 

SUBJECT:

POLICE DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THREE LIQUOR LICENSE ITEMS ON THE FEBRUARY 3, 2010 FORMAL AGENDA

 

 

The attached memorandum supplements the Request for Council Action reports for three liquor license items on the February 3, 2010 Formal Council Agenda.  This memorandum provides the Council with additional information regarding Police Department disapproval recommendations for the following items:

 

New Items

 

·        District 5, Uno Stop

·        District 8, Allen’s Bistro

·        District 8, Llerutan Distributing

 

 

 

For further information regarding these items, please contact the City Clerk Department, License Services Section at 602-262-7003.

 


 

Police Department Liquor License Disapproval Recommendation

 

Application Information

 

Business Name

Uno Stop

 

District

5

Business Location

4150 N 35th Avenue

 

 

 

Applicant Name

Imad Yousif Warda

 

Series Type

10

Text Box: LIQUOR LICENSE DISAPPROVAL FORM

The Police Department recommends disapproval of this liquor license application for the following reasons:

  • There are possible hidden ownership concerns:

 

During a review of the state liquor license application for 4150 N. 35th Avenue, Imad                   Yousif Warda disclosed himself as 100% stockholder and member of Uno Stop Market 2 LLC, listed owner for this location.

 

Section 13 question 4 asks “If the premises are leased give leasers name: “Mr. Warda answered this with “35th Avenue Retail Center, LLC”   whose members include Britton Lee, manager/owner and Esther Minlee, member.

 

When asked about indebtedness for this location Mr. Warda answered “Zero.”

On the city application question 9 asks “How much was paid for the business and the source of funds used to pay for this business.” Mr. Warda answered with $2,500.00 which came from personal savings with “Zero” debt.

 

This location was originally licensed, # 100774376, and owned by Rokd Group LLC whose members included Britton Lee. It was purchased for $1.5 million dollars and later sold to Albert Gorais Odesho, brother in law of Imad Warda, for $1.8 million dollars. Mr. Odesho obtained financing and later became delinquent on payments with his bank for this location.

 

During a conversation with Mr. Odesho he related Mr. Lee worked with Mr. Odesho’s bank and purchased the property back in July 2009. Mr. Odesho paid $9,760.00 a month for three months to avoid the foreclosure and to stay in business.

 

Mr. Odesho and Mr. Lee did not report this incident to the DLLC or AZ Corporation commission within the required time frame, selling beer and wine under Mr. Odesho’s liquor license, #10075063 since July 2009. Mr. Imad Warda disclosed on his application he has been working at this location since September 2004 and later confirmed this.

 

In November 2009, Mr. Lee, owner of the property, known as Quality Gasoline, evicted Mr. Odesho and has allowed beer and wine to be sold there with Mr. Odesho’s license.

A record of this unreported business transaction was documented on Phoenix Police report #2009-92011452.

 

On December 22, 2009, Officer Martinez 8338 and I met with Mr. Odesho and asked about ownership of the store. He confirmed all the information on his application and said it was true. He stated he owned the store and when asked if there were any other owners related no. When asked if he has worked at the 4150 N 35th Avenue location he told me he works there now.

 

When asked about the purchase price he told us he purchases the inventory for $2,000.00 from Britton Lee. He later admitted he was in debt to Britton Lee for $50,000.00 and was the deal for leasing the property. Mr. Warda wanted to consult with his lawyer on this matter. 

 

Due to the fact Britton Lee is the current owner of 4150 N 35th Avenue and Mr. Warda failed to disclose him as financier for Uno Stop Market 2 and the true amount of debt of $ 50,000.00, it questions the reliability, qualifications and capability to obtain a liquor license for this location.

 

The applicant has failed to make full financial disclosure:

 

As described above, the applicant failed to provide a full financial disclosure and disclosures provided were confusing. No financial documents regarding sources of income were provided even upon request.

 

This recommendation for disapproval is submitted by: Detective Cortez

SIGNATURES

Investigating Detective

J.M. McTernan 4684

Liquor Enforcement Detail Supervisor

Sgt. Mark Doty 5785


 

Police Department Liquor License Investigative Summary

 

Application Information

 

Business Name

ALLEN'S BISTRO

 

District

8

Business Location

1301 East Broadway Road

 

 

 

Applicant Name

Tonya Allen

 

Series

12 

Text Box: LIQUOR LICENSE DISAPPROVAL FORM

          The applicant is not qualified to hold a liquor license due to:

           

The applicant, Tonya Allen has three outstanding liens against her. The first is for $2,636.87 from the Garden Lakes Community Association. The judgment was issued through the Estrella Mountain Justice Court on November 20th 2009. The total judgment was still outstanding per The Travis Law Firm as of December 9, 2009. The judgment is for outstanding Community association dues and fines for a home that she owned. The fees are from 2006 to present. The second judgment is for $651.43 for a tax lien from the City of Avondale. The total amount of this lien is still outstanding per the City of Avondale as of December 9, 2009. The third lien is for Limb Investors for a current balance of approximately $25,000.00. This judgment was issued through the Maricopa County Superior Court and per Attorney John Gilbert is outstanding as of December 10, 2009. In total, the applicant, Tonya Allen has approximately $28,288.30 in outstanding liens that have not been addressed.

 

The applicant explained that she had knowledge of the judgment from Limb Investors but did not agree with the judgment and has no plans to pay it. The applicant also has no pending legal action to reverse the judgment. The applicant also said that she is aware of the origin of the other two liens but also does not think they are just and has no plans of paying them. There is no pending legal action to reverse either of the two judgments.

           

·                    Additional reasons for disapproval include:

 

The applicant explained that the situation surrounding the $25,000 judgment from Limb Investors was due to a Child Care business that she had purchased and was operating under the previous owner’s child care license. When this license was no longer valid the applicant was unable to obtain a current license to operate the establishment. Due to the fact that she could not operate the child care facility; she was unable to pay the building lease. The non payment of the lease resulted in the $25,000 judgment.

The lease was at 1044 East Broadway Road in Mesa. The lease began on August 17 of 2007 and was for $4300.00 per month. The rent payment of $4300.00 for October of 2007 was paid with a check that had inefficient funds and the rent for November was not paid.  There has been no attempt to pay this outstanding lien by the applicant to date.           

 

For the above mentioned reasons the applicant has failed to demonstrate the reliability, capability and qualification required of a liquor licensee in the State of Arizona.


 

This recommendation for disapproval is submitted by:  M. Ballentine #7294

SIGNATURES

Investigating Detective

 

Liquor Enforcement Detail Supervisor

 

 


 

Police Department Liquor License Investigative Summary

 

Application Information

 

Business Name

LLERUTAN

 

District

8

Business Location

1542 East Victory Street #3

 

 

 

Applicant Name

Ronald Johnson

 

Series

4

Text Box: LIQUOR LICENSE DISAPPROVAL FORM

          The applicant has the following criminal background:

           

On July 2, 2001, Ronald Michael Johnson entered a plea of guilty to one count of assault by causing fear of injury in the Glendale Municipal Court. There were also two other charges involved with this incident of unlawful imprisonment and disorderly conduct – fighting, that were dismissed. As a result of this plea, Mr. Johnson served 10 days in jail, was placed on 24 months probation and was ordered to attend a counseling program and submit to substance abuse screening. Mr. Johnson failed to include any of this information on his state liquor application but did admit during a phone conversation that he had spent approximately two weeks in jail for this incident.

 

On April 5, 2007, Ronald Johnson was booked into the Maricopa County Jail on one count of child abuse, a class two felony, for repeatedly striking his 11 year old stepson on the back of the legs and buttocks with a belt causing red and dark purple marks. Mr. Johnson then kicked his wife and stepson out of the home they shared and took their keys and garage door opener. When the officer confronted Mr. Johnson about kicking his wife and stepson out of the house, he responded that his wife was not on the deed and she had no right to be there. Mr. Johnson also said it is not his problem that his wife does not have a place to live. Again, Mr. Johnson failed to document this arrest on question 15 of the state application. The case was turned down by the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office due to no reasonable likelihood for conviction.

 

Mr. Johnson has an extensive criminal history including the following arrests:

 

§         1990 Chicago, Illinois - arrest for unlawful use of a weapon

§         1992 Chicago, Illinois - arrest for possession of a stolen vehicle, vehicle identification altered, battery and assault

§         1993 Chicago, Illinois - arrest for battery and damage to property

§         1996 Chicago, Illinois - arrest for domestic battery and unlawful trespass/vehicle

§         1997 Chicago, Illinois - arrest for battery

§         1997 Phoenix, Arizona - arrest for interfering with judicial proceedings and obstructing justice

§         1998 Phoenix, Arizona - arrest for assault, disorderly conduct and trespassing

§         1998 Mesa, Arizona - arrest for assault, disorderly conduct, criminal trespass and interfering with judicial proceedings

           

 

          The application was falsified in the following manner:

 

On section 13 of the state application, Mr. Johnson indicated that his residence from January of 2008, until the present is 7924 East Peralta Avenue in Mesa. Mr. Johnson indicated that he owned this residence. Upon a check of the property on the Maricopa County Assessors website, it was discovered that a Mr. Ryan Southard was the listed owner of the property since March 2005.

 

On July 23, 2009, Mr. Ryan Southard was contacted at 7924 East Peralta Avenue. Mr. Southard provided information that Mr. Johnson lived at this location in a guest house for a short time but left the residence in January of 2009.

 

When Mr. Johnson was asked to provide his address during a meeting on July 28, he provided the Peralta address. During a subsequent phone conversation on July 29, Mr. Johnson said he had been contacted by Mr. Southard and advised that someone had stopped by asking about him. Mr. Johnson said he did live at the Peralta address but he has not stayed there for approximately three months. Mr. Johnson claims that he does not have a residence but stays with girlfriends. He was unable to provide an address for his current residence. Mr. Johnson was asked why he claimed that he owned the Peralta property and he responded that the application was completed by his lawyer and he did not tell him that he owned the house. Mr. Johnson said that he did not read the application prior to signing it in front of a notary even though the application says, “I have read this questionnaire and all statements are true, correct and complete”.

 

 

          The applicant has failed to make a full financial disclosure:

           

On question nine of the city questionnaire, Mr. Johnson stated that $60,000 was paid for the business and the source of these funds was personal savings. During a meeting with Mr. Johnson on July 28, he claimed the personal savings were earned through the sale of his last home located at 7155 West Wethersfield Road in the City of Peoria. The home was sold on August 24, 2006, for $540,000. Mr. Johnson provided a bank statement from a Bank of America account in the name of CRJ Capitol LLC. with two separate deposits from title companies. The first deposit was on October 14, 2005, from Metro Title for $11,754.50. This deposit occurred prior to the sale of the home that Mr. Johnson claims to have received the business funds from. The second deposit was on August 30, 2006, from Fidelity National Title for $67,659.01 for an ending account balance of $80,465.53.

           

After conducting a Department Of Economic Security check of Mr. Johnson’s wages, it was discovered that he applied for, and received food stamps on October 22, 2008, and continued to receive this assistance until May of 2009. On question 12 of the state questionnaire, Mr. Johnson lists that he has been unemployed from May of 2004, until the present.

           

The only income that Mr. Johnson provided was the sale of the home at 7515 West Wethersfield and his disability income. Mr. Johnson provided documentation that he has received disability payments for a 20% loss of function in his right leg. The disability payments began in September of 1999, and he received monthly payments of $791.58 for a period of ten months.

 

Mr. Johnson did not provide any further documentation of any type of income. During our phone conversation, Mr. Johnson claimed that the money from the sale of his previous home was used to start his own line of alcoholic beverages called Naturell and was not used to start his wholesale business. Mr. Johnson claims to be looking for investors to fund the wholesale business but at the time of this application, none have been secured. Mr. Johnson was unable to provide a source of income to pay the $700.00 per month lease payment for the building.

 

Mr. Johnson has not proven himself to be reliable due to the fact that he falsified his application by failing to document numerous arrests and convictions within the last ten years. Mr. Johnson also claimed his residence was a location that he admitted he has not stayed at in at least three months and failed to provide a current place of residence. When confronted with this information, Mr. Johnson claims that his lawyer filled out the application incorrectly and he did not review it prior to signing the document in front of a notary affirming that the document was correct and true.

 

Mr. Johnson has also not proven himself to be capable, qualified or reliable due to his inability to make a full financial disclosure. The financial documentation provided was from 2005 and 2006 however, Mr. Johnson filed for food stamps in 2008, and received the assistance until 2009. Mr. Johnson later claimed that the financial documentation was for the startup for his liquor brand but he is still looking for investors to fund the wholesale business.

 

For all of the above mentioned reasons, the applicant has failed to demonstrate the capability, qualifications and reliability required of a liquor licensee in the State of Arizona.

 

 

This recommendation for disapproval is submitted by: Michael Ballentine #7294

SIGNATURES

Investigating Detective

 

Liquor Enforcement Detail Supervisor

 

 


 

FOLLOW-UP:  JANUARY 26, 2010 WORK STUDY SESSION

GENERAL INFORMATION

TO:

Mayor And City Council

 

PACKET DATE:

January 28, 2010

FROM:

David Cavazos

City Manager

 

 

 

 

 

SUBJECT:

FOLLOW-UP:  JANUARY 26, 2010 WORK STUDY SESSION

 

 

Attached are the January 26, 2010 Work Study Session minutes and Consent Agenda Results.


*REVISED

 

 

CITY OF PHOENIX

CITY COUNCIL WORK STUDY SESSION

TUESDAY, JANUARY 26, 2010 - 2:00 P.M.

CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS

200 WEST JEFFERSON STREET

 

 

Pursuant to A.R.S. § 38.431.02, notice is hereby given to the members of the City Council and to the general public that the City Council will hold a meeting open to the public on Tuesday, January 26, 2010, at 2:00 P.M. located in the City Council Chambers, 200 West Jefferson Street, Phoenix, Arizona. 

 

 

1:00 P.M. -

AN EXECUTIVE SESSION WAS CALLED FOR THIS TIME AT THE POLICY SESSION MEETING OF JANUARY 5, 2010. 

 

THE TIMES LISTED FOR AGENDA ITEMS ARE ESTIMATED.  ITEMS MAY BE DISCUSSED EARLIER OR IN A DIFFERENT SEQUENCE.

 

Action Taken:

Mayor Gordon called the meeting to order at 3:18 p.m. with Council members Gates, Williams, Mattox, Neely, and DiCiccio were present.  Councilman Johnson joined the meeting at 3:20 p.m.[e1]   Vice Mayor Nowakowski and Councilman Simplot were absent.

 

ESTIMATED

1.    2:00 P.M.-

COUNCIL INFORMATION AND FOLLOW-UP REQUESTS.

 

This item is scheduled to give City Council members an opportunity to publicly request information or follow-up on issues of interest to the community.  If the information is available, staff will immediately provide it to the City Council member.  No decisions will be made or action taken.

 

Action Taken:

There were no announcements or follow-up requested.

 

CONSENT AGENDA. 

 

This item is scheduled to allow the City Council to act on the Mayor’s recommendations on the Consent Agenda.  The Consent Agenda has been publicly posted.

 

Action Taken:

Councilwoman Neely motioned for approval.  Councilman Mattox seconded the motion, which passed 6:0.

 

CALL FOR AN EXECUTIVE SESSION.

 

A vote to call an Executive Session may be held.

 

Action Item:

There was no call for an Executive Session.

 

 

REPORTS AND BUDGET UPDATES BY THE CITY MANAGER.

 

This item is scheduled to allow the City Manager to report on changes in the City Council Agenda and provide brief informational reports on urgent issues.  The City Council may discuss these reports but no action will be taken.

 

Action Item:

City Manager David Cavazos introduced a delegation from the State of Jalisco, Mexico.

 

ESTIMATED

2.      2:30 P.M.-

INNOVATION AND EFFICIENCY TASK FORCE

Staff:   Zuercher, Cotton
(Presentation 10 min.)

 

Due to existing economic challenges, the City must develop and implement innovative processes that result in more efficient delivery of services, while at the same time maximize the use of limited taxpayer dollars.  Initiatives by other dynamic organizations to identify and promote innovation and continuous improvement have resulted in improved service delivery at the most effective cost.

 

This item is for information only.  No City Council action is required.

 

Action Taken:

City Manager David Cavazos stated the Innovation and Efficiency Task Force would provide a brief overview and ask for City Council input. Mr. Cavazos indicated innovation and efficiency would take place everyday, concentrating on department core missions, cost reductions, and maintaining services through streamlining and consolidation.  He discussed two phases of consolidations.  Mr. Cavazos commented the City would significantly decrease the number of departments within the next twelve to eighteen months.  Mr. Cavazos noted department consolidations would be presented to Council for approval.

 

Councilwoman Neely left the meeting at 3:25 p.m.

Mr. Cavazos introduced the task force Co-Chairs, Director of Aviation Danny Murphy and Public Transit Director Debbie Cotton.  Mr. Murphy indicated the City Manager had created this task force to address current economic challenges. Mr. Murphy noted four additional action subcommittees had been created and would meet with the task force every other week.

 

Ms. Cotton indicated Phoenix had experienced tremendous growth in population which demanded more services, however, the economic situation has required the City to look at other ways to live within its fiscal resources in order to move forward.  Ms. Cotton indicated the City has to redefine what are its essential services to residents, while still continuing to provide outstanding customer service.  Ms. Cotton noted the City would include community input in its evaluation.  She added the task force would be looking at best practices from other cities, the private sector, and non-profits, constantly reviewing services to reduce costs, embracing change, and remaining current with the financial realities.  Ms. Cotton introduced the Innovation and Efficiency Task Force mission statement:  To develop and implement innovative solutions that would result in the most efficient delivery of services at the most effective cost

 

Councilwoman Neely returned to the meeting at 3:30 p.m.

 

Mr. Murphy discussed four deliverables which included:

 

·        Identify and implement process improvements and efficiencies in service delivery

·        Identify methods to move beyond cost recovery to revenue enhancement

·        Identify Core Mission of City departments and examine opportunities for Public/Private Partnerships

·        Review organizational structures and recommend consolidations

 

Ms. Cotton stated the members of the Innovation and Efficiency Task Force consisted of fifteen operating departments.  Ms. Cotton added the Task Force would also conduct outreach to the community to incorporate their ideas.  Ms. Cotton stated the task force would return to Council with short-, mid-, and long-term updates.

 

Mayor Gordon asked that the Task Force bring forward recommendations for Council vote before the short-, mid-, or long-term updates.  Mr. Murphy added the Task Force would also be meeting every other week with the City Manager who would provide updates for the Council.

 

Mayor Gordon commented the City had been addressing new innovations and efficiencies for some time.  He asked how much money had been saved since last March.  Mr. Cavazos replied innovations and efficiencies had been taking place since the 1950s when the Charter was reformed.  He added $20 million had been saved since last March due to innovations and efficiencies.

 

Mayor Gordon asked how much money had departments been able to save over the last four months.  Mr. Cavazos replied departments had saved $37 million.

 

Mayor Gordon asked that the Task Force provide an ongoing report that contained all recommendations including the rejected ones.  Both Ms. Cotton and Mr. Murphy agreed.

 

Councilman Gates thanked the Task Force members for their efforts and the City Manager for its creation.  He also asked the Task Force to consider locally owned businesses and contractors when considering privatization.

 

Councilwoman Williams asked the Task Force to involve retired executives from the private sector to attain their perspective and feedback.  She added the Task Force should consider inviting retired executives to the Task Force meetings.  Councilwoman Williams also asked that the Task Force consider appropriateness and balance when considering implementing cost recovery for services. 

 

Councilman Mattox stated his support to incorporate private sector executives in the Task Force.  He asked that the Task Force look at the vendor-approved list to add more cost-effective vendors.  He also asked that the task force find a way for the City to participate in its own Request for Proposal process similar to the Solid Waste Managed Competition.

 

Councilwoman Williams left the meeting at 4:08 p.m.

 

Councilman Johnson stated his support for small and local businesses in the potential pursuit of privatizing City services.  He added he would like to see the Task Force research the option of conducting professional and contractual services in-house, review departmental charges and make them more reasonable, centralize bulk item purchases in an attempt to reduce cost, and explore areas of expertise where the City would be a regional service provider to smaller municipalities. 

 

Councilman Johnson left the meeting at 4:10 p.m.

 

Councilman DiCiccio asked if members of the private sector would be a part of the Innovation and Efficiency Task Force.  Mr. Murphy explained the Task Force would initially include City Manager Office representatives and Department/Function Heads, with a separate group conducting outreach to bring in the community and private sector input.

 

Mayor Gordon expressed concern involving the business community due to potential conflict of interest.  City Attorney Gary Verburg indicated the appointment of private sector members to a working committee by City Council would convert it into a subcommittee that would have to abide by open meeting law rules.

 

Councilman DiCiccio stated it would be beneficial to make the Innovation and Efficiency Task Force a subcommittee so that the public could be a part of the Task Force.

 

Councilwoman Neely stated the City specialized in many areas in which smaller cities would be willing to pay for those services and benefit from the City’s help.  She expressed her interest in the City becoming a regional service provider.  Councilwoman Neely noted her support for utilizing City staff’s expertise in addressing efficiency savings. 

 

Councilwoman Neely left the meeting at 4:34 p.m.

 

Mayor Gordon commented the City was successful because it evaluated innovation and efficiencies before proceeding.  He added City cuts to service costs and salaries will impact the level of customer service and privatization should be considered more than just a low-cost benefit.

 

Councilwoman Neely returned to the meeting at 4:36 p.m.

 

Backup included in Council packet/City Clerk’s Office.

 

ESTIMATED

3.      2:40 P.M.-

BUDGET UPDATE

Staff:   Zuercher, Gleason
(Presentation 10 min.)

 

This report provides additional information to the Mayor and City Council on the Public Safety Specialty Funds and the General Fund financial transactions that will be included in the budget-balancing proposal.

 

* This item is for information, discussion and possible action.

 

Action Taken:

Budget and Research Director Cathy Gleason provided a budget update regarding Public Safety Specialty Funds.  Ms. Gleason indicated current sales tax collections have not been enough to cover current cost of existing Police and Fire Department positions, leaving these funds structurally out of balance.  Ms. Gleason indicated a preliminary balancing plan had been developed to balance these funds by June 2012, noting positions would need to be reduced by January 2011.  She added other factors and actions that would reduce the need for layoffs in these funds included reduction of employee costs, achieving sales tax collections above projections, and adding new revenue.  Ms. Gleason stated staff recommended preparation of further analysis over the summer after the General Fund budget was balanced and labor costs and specialty fund revenue changes were known.  She added staff would return in early fall with final recommendations to adopt a contingency policy and proposed number of layoffs necessary to balance the budget by June 2012.  Ms. Gleason explained projected attrition rates had not been reached within the Police Department, adding there were two possible solutions that included additional cuts to the Police Department’s budget and/or employee concessions in the current year.

 

*Mayor Gordon asked the following questions: 1) what was the average salary for a police officer; 2) what percentage of employee cost pertained to Public Safety; 3) was Public Safety’s salary tax earmarked for protection; and 4) how many protected Public Safety positions were in the General Fund.  Ms. Gleason replied Public Safety costs made up seventy percent of the General Fund budget with the cost of an average sworn public safety officer being over $120,000 in salary and benefits.  She stated Public Safety’s salary was protected.  Lastly, she explained there were about 5,000 Police and Fire Department positions in the General Fund.

 

Mayor Gordon asked if the City eliminated every department to balance the budget, protecting Public Safety, would the City have the ability to keep operating.  Ms. Gleason replied no.

 

Ms. Gleason indicated an estimated $95 million in General Fund financial transactions is recommended to help balance the budget over the next two years.  She explained some of the financial transactions included the following:

 

  • Reduced contributions to reserve funds
  • Debt service restructuring
  • Lease-purchase financing for essential fleet replacement
  • Move property tax from secondary to primary to pay for tort claims
  • Reduce pay-as-you-go capital
  • Health insurance premium holiday

 

Ms. Gleason also noted expenditures were exceeding revenue collections and that the City would mostly likely not have access to these one-time financial transactions in the future.

 

Councilman Gates asked if the financial transactions included the current fiscal year and the following year.  Ms. Gleason replied the financial transactions had been evenly split between this fiscal year and next year.

 

Councilman Gates asked about the Specialty Fund reductions, noting they did not appear to be evenly distributed.  Ms. Gleason responded that was correct due to vacancies and future changes.  Mr. Zuercher added Police positions took longer to fill than Fire positions.  Councilman Gates clarified Police and Fire Department Specialty funding would not be addressed until February or March.  Ms. Gleason replied that was correct.

 

Councilman Gates asked if City Council policy and decisions could impact specialty fund revenues.  City Manager David Cavazos replied revenues from the food tax could go directly to specialty funds.

 

Backup included in Council packet/City Clerk’s Office.

 

ESTIMATED

3:20 P.M. – ADJOURNMENT

 

Action Taken:

Mayor Gordon adjourned the meeting at 4:56 p.m.

 

 

For further information, please call the Management Intern, City Manager's Office, at 602-262-4449.

 

For reasonable accommodations, call the Management Intern at Voice/602-262-4449 or TTY/602-534-5500 as early as possible to coordinate needed arrangements.

 

Si necesita traducción en español, por favor llame a la oficina del gerente de la Ciudad de Phoenix, 602-262-4449 tres días antes de la fecha de la junta.

 

 

PHOENIX CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS

 

Councilman DiCiccio

Councilman Gates

Councilman Johnson

Councilman Mattox

Councilwoman Neely

Councilman Simplot

Councilwoman Williams

Vice Mayor Nowakowski

Mayor Gordon

 

 


 

 

CITY OF PHOENIX

CITY COUNCIL CONSENT AGENDA

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 26, 2010 - 2:00 P.M.

CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS

200 WEST JEFFERSON

 

 

RECOMMENDED BY THE MAYOR FOR APPROVAL

 

 

All items below are also recommended by the City Manager.

 

1.         Consideration of City Council approval to create an Energize Phoenix Revolving Loan Fund; initiate an incentive for multi-family property owners in the Green Rail Corridor to complete energy efficiency retrofits through lower sales tax rates to participating property owners; and reinvest, at a limited predetermined level, the energy efficiency savings resulting from energy efficiency retrofit of City buildings into the Energy Management Program.

            APPROVED:  Osuna, Naimark, Perkins, Mann

 

2.                  Consideration of City Council approval, guidance, and direction of the recommendations on State legislation of interest to the City.

APPROVED:  Cavazos, Peters

 


 

CITY COUNCIL REPORT

COUNCIL REQUEST

TO:

Mayor And City Council

 

PACKET DATE:

January 28, 2010

FROM:

Lisa Takata

Executive Assistant To The City Manager

 

 

 

 

SUBJECT:

RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FROM COUNCIL/CITIZENS

 

 

Councilman DiCiccio

·

 

Councilman DiCiccio requested staff to look into combining staffing efforts for trade shows with other valley cities as a way to save money.

 


 

CITY COUNCIL REPORT

COUNCIL REQUEST

TO:

David Krietor

Deputy City Manager

PACKET DATE:

January 28, 2010

FROM:

John Chan, Interim Director

Phoenix Convention Center

 

 

 

 

SUBJECT:

RESPONSE TO COUNCILMAN DICICCIO

 

 

This report responds to the January 12, 2010 Work Study Session request by Councilman DiCiccio.

 

THE ISSUE

 

Councilman DiCiccio requested staff to look into combining staffing efforts by the Greater Phoenix Convention and Visitors Bureau (GPCVB) for trade shows with other valley cities as a way to save money.

 

OTHER INFORMATION

 

The GPCVB is a private, not-for-profit organization that promotes and markets the greater Phoenix region as a year-round convention and travel destination.  Specifically, the GPCVB provides marketing services to the City for the Phoenix Convention Center Department as well as promoting Phoenix hotels for conventions and tourism.  Services include convention sales, multi-cultural convention and tourism attraction, convention and tourism advertising, housing and convention support services, travel industry sales, and visitor services.  The sales and marketing services provided by the GPCVB are essential to the programmatic and economic success of the Phoenix Convention Center and the City of Phoenix.

 

In order to fulfill its mission in a cost-effective manner, the GPCVB routinely partners with industry partners from the Arizona Office of Tourism, the Scottsdale CVB, valley hotels, and others on a number of cooperative sales and marketing initiatives.  Ongoing joint efforts typically include sharing a booth at multiple annual client tradeshows, advertising co-ops, media PR and outreach to international and domestic travel writers, joint sales missions to meet with tour operators and travel agents, and hosting travel industry familiarization (FAM) tours.

 

The GPCVB works closely with its industry partners and seeks opportunities to partner and collaborate on initiatives to maximize efficiencies and resources while also promoting and marketing the brand and destination that is uniquely Phoenix.  In addition, the GPCVB leverages the City’s contribution through private sector resources to enhance the City’s marketing investment.

 

CONCLUSION

 

This report is for information only.  No Council action is required.

 

 


 [e1]Councilman Johnson joined the meeting right after Council voted for the Consent Agenda.  Should this be moved?

Last Modified on 02/01/2010 13:20:55