Applications are first reviewed for eligibility by staff.
This year there will be an additional review step for proposals that indicate they will work with vulnerable populations. Applicants who indicate in their application that they will work with vulnerable populations will be asked additional questions that will be reviewed by a group of subject matter experts like school teachers, social workers, and trauma informed practitioners. This step is part of the eligibility review portion.
Eligible applications are then reviewed by panels comprised of conflict-free arts and cultural workers specialized in the respective project area. Panelists will review and score all completed applications based on the evaluation criteria.
An application is considered complete if it has responded to all the narrative questions and has included the required attachments (work samples and budget).
Evaluation Criteria
OVERVIEW: The applicant provides a project overview and a succinct description of the project. (10 points)
COMMUNITY SIGNIFICANCE: The applicant identifies the primary beneficiary of the project; demonstrates an understanding of the project's meaning and importance to participants; has a plan to ensure the project is accessible to diverse group of participants. (30 points)
ARTISTIC/CULTURAL VALUE: The applicant proposes a project with arts and culture as a primary experience; artists have an important role in the design and delivery of the project; support materials are evidence that the project can be completed. (30 points)
LOGISTICS AND FEASIBILITY: The applicant has outlined a clear and plausible planning timeline; defines evaluation criteria of the success of the project; the budget is a reflection of the activities and is clear and organized. (30 points)